From Forum Signatures to FLOPS: A Two-Decade Look at PC Hardware summary: Comparing my 2008 rig (as posted in a psicofxp.com signature) with current hardware, to explore what changed, what didn’t, and what’s actually “planned obsolescence.”

June 2025  — 
 WIPNostalgiaRetroComputingRant

My 2008 Rig (by psicofxp.com Forum Signature)

Athlon64 3200+ Venice s.754 
MSI K8N V v2.0 (nForce3 250) 
Sapphire Radeon 9550 @ 472 / 472
Markvision + Spectek DDR-400 2x512MB 
Creative Audigy 7.1 24-bit 
WD 40GB ATA100 7200 RPM 
Euro case with LEDs and window 
"550W" generic PSU (soon to be replaced) 
15" generic CRT @ 1152x864 
Aiwa NSX-500 mini component system

Tools

  • ATI Tray Tools
    • RaBiT
      • ATiWinflash / ATiFlash
        • SuperPI mod 1.5
          • Physical mods: side windows, cold cathodes, front intake holes
            • CRTs rescued from e-waste — because LCDs were still a luxury

              Spec Comparison: Then and Now

              Component2003: Radeon 95502004: X850 XT2007: HD 2600 Pro2013: R9 270X2017: RX 5602021: Radeon 6600 XT
              ArchitectureRV350 (DX9b)R480 (DX9c)RV630 (DX10.1)Pitcairn XTPolaris 21Navi 23 (RDNA2)
              Process130nm130nm65nm28nm14nm7nm
              VRAM128–256MB DDR256MB GDDR3512MB DDR22GB GDDR54GB GDDR58GB GDDR6
              Bus width128-bit256-bit128-bit256-bit128-bit128-bit
              Clock (MHz)~250~520~600~1000~1176~2359 (boost)
              GFLOPS~4.4~83~200~1971~2600~10,600
              TDP (watts)~30W~75W~45W~180W~80W160W
              FLOPS/W~0.15~1.1~4.4~10.9~32.5~66
              MSRP (launch)~$90~$499~$149~$199~$130~$379
              FLOPS/$~0.05~0.16~1.34~7.65~10.0~28

              Note: These values are approximations based on reference models and typical clock speeds. Values can vary by SKU and manufacturer.

              The Fast Decay of Old Hardware

              Some parts of that rig are still usable (hello, Aiwa). Others aged out due to:

              • Instruction set deprecation
                • Graphics APIs
                  • Storage protocols
                    • Secure boot and TPM

                      These are not all examples of planned obsolescence. Some are the result of:

                      • Physics and economics (Moore’s Law, thermals)
                        • Software complexity
                          • Developer productivity vs. backward compatibility

                            Planned obsolescence means designing something to break, the flaws being introduced in the design by intention. That’s not the same as aging. Some will say, “Oh, my Athlon XP 2000+ with 512MB DDR ran Windows XP more smoothly than this bloated phone runs Android, even with 8 ARM cores and 6GB of RAM. I'm sure it has something like if(rand()%2==0) sleep(1);buried somewhere inside.

                            I'm not here to defend all software choices (I'm sure there’s bloat) but hardware really has improved. Here's a look at raw performance per dollar over time. The numbers speak for themselves:

                            So, it’s worth distinguishing between “not supported” and “made to break”.

                            Something similar happens about performance per dollar. Without considering the USD inflation rate:

                            Normalized IPC of AMD processors

                            Just to show why Bulldozer (💀) needed higher clocks than K8 (♥)

                            Conclusion: A System’s Value Over Time

                            That Athlon 64 gave me 4+ years of usable computing + Internet + gaming. It booted fast and taught me BIOS editing, hardware modding, a bit of electronics, what not to do. I definitely learned more from that build than I have from some modern plug-and-play systems. Today’s hardware could be faster, but maybe not as personal (?).

                            That's why I'm not upgrading every generation. It isn’t about resisting progress but it’s about timing (?) In areas like GPUs, CPUs, and SSDs, waiting a few months can improve performance per dollar. Prices drop, new generations emerge, and a lower-tier model from a newer family might outperform a mid-range part from the previous one with better efficiency. For instance, trading a RX 560 for a RX 6400 gets you more performance at lower power and MSRP.

                            So, you want to compare your old GPU against your current one? That doesn't sound fair, you should start by measuring performance and power consumption, then divide.

                            Next steps: I’ll add screenshots of the X850 XT and HD 2600 Pro, maybe include a gallery/ folder in the repo with captured BIOS dumps or tray tool screenshots.

                            No Pages Found